Archive for March 24th, 2008

Operation Chaos… SP’s are loosing it!

March 24, 2008


I like the old logo from Get Smart better than Rush’s but I’m sure there are some copywrite issues that he would have to worry about.

The Democrat party looks like a scene from the the book/movie ALIVE. They are chewing each other apart and we Conservatives are just watching and waiting.  The main course will be served in Colorado in late August at the DNC Convention (If there is anything left on the bones, otherwise it’s time to make soup.)

Bill Clinton is called a McCarthy-ite, Bill Richardson is labeled a “Judas” by James Carville, Liberal Feminists are upset that Hillary as a nutcracker figure is OK for some but they want to know why it’s so wrong for Obama be portrayed as a Stepin Fetchit action figure?  Kennedy & Kerry are abandoning the will of Massachusetts Democrats and drinking the Obama Super Delegate Kool-Aid, and Hillary has to make up stories to punch-up the FACTS that came to light when her calendar of events as the wife of the President of the United States was released this past week.  CHOMP. CHOMP, CHOMP.

Pass fava beans and a nice Chianti.

Don’t Call me a Liberal…

March 24, 2008

BHO…The Progressive
Words matter, the meaning of words also matter. Barack Obama has forgotten one of life’s little lessons, “sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me.” Well, Barack has a few problems with some words. I will not re-plow the field of his middle name, that’s been addressed by many already, all I will say is that can’t be blamed on a TWP, that was his father’s doing. My issue is that Barack H. Obama doesn’t want to be labeled a “Liberal”.

Apparently that “name” will certainly hurt him. So when faced with a problem like that what do Liberals do? They reach into their bag of tricks and pull out a new word: PROGRESSIVE, that sound much better. Here’s what BHO said recently:

Obama, in an interview, said that “a lot of these old labels don’t apply anymore.” He said he was a progressive and a pragmatist, eager to tackle the big issues like health care and convinced that the Democrats could rally independents and disaffected Republicans to their agenda. (International Herald Tribune)

So in order to keep current with the “progression” of the aforementioned Liberals, we need to change a few of the “old labels” to reflect the new Democrat lexicon. Let’s start with how we track the most Liberal, I mean “Progressive” Senators, the National Journal’s 2007 Voting Ratings. They said of, BHO:

Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was the most liberal senator in 2007, according to National Journal’s 27th annual vote ratings. The insurgent presidential candidate shifted further to the left last year in the run-up to the primaries, after ranking as the 16th- and 10th-most-liberal during his first two years in the Senate. (NJ-online)

He’s not just “Progressive” his “Super Progressive” and he moved further to the left (can we still say left?, I better check my Liberal Decoder Ring and see is there is a new term for left) nope, they’re still using that word, I’m OK. The bottom line is this, whether you call him Liberal or Progressive he’s still not RIGHT.